The destruction of the First World
War resulted in an extreme amount of casualties and suffering which in turn,
initiated a new trend for artists to reject the rationality of thought as a
tool to critique society. This trend is known as Dadaism. Dadaist artists
embraced the rejection of expression to eliminate the idea of the subjective
art form. They figured if thinking rationally is what brought on World War I,
then, thinking irrationally must prevent anything of the like. This is
completely against the traditional conventions of art and challenges the artist
as subject.
One artist in particular who had a
huge impact on Dadaism was Marcel Duchamp and his piece Fountain of 1917. With a piece such as Fountain, Duchamp questioned artistic convention and critiqued the
idea of art itself. This sculpture is an example of what he called a “ready-made”,
which is a mass produced, manufactured or a found-man-made object. Basically,
he purchased a standard, functional urinal, positioned it with its back facing
flat on a horizontal surface, and signed it as “R. Mutt”. Dadaism wanted to
bring humor to the somber world by making fun of art. Apparently, his signature
refers to the plumbing company called “Mott” and also is a symbol of the comic
character, Mutt; this doesn’t really make sense and seems chaotic, just like
Dadaism. Duchamp came up with works such as this to create a new thought for
already existing objects. He wanted his viewers to wonder if his work should be
characterized as art or not, and what exactly should constitute art. Before I
learned about art history or any kind of artistic trends, I never considered
something like Duchamp’s Fountain
art, and I still don’t. However, I do appreciate the point he is trying to
make. Art isn’t always about making a statement and I believe that art serves
as a different purpose for everybody. I love that he forces a different
perspective on mundane objects, and he impresses me with some of his ideas. Certainly,
every person has the potential to be an artist, but it’s a combination of
technical skill and the creativity to execute a work of art.
Moreover,
Dadaism grew more extreme and became a new art movement called Surrealism. This
new style was based on the elements of Dadaism in its critique of society, but
its primary focus was on the Marxist and Freudian influences, more
specifically, an exploration of sexuality. One artist who is the epitome of
surrealism in terms of Freudian values was Salvador Dali. His painting Birth of Liquid Desires of 1931 is the
perfect example of the irrationality of dreams and the subconscious. For
example, Dali uses imagery that could never be seen in reality, such as the
large yellow biomorphic shape in the background. There is a theme of rejection
and turmoil based on the two figures in the center of the piece, giving a sense
of sexual desire and guilty arousal while the dark cloud looms above them.
During the time that Dali painted Birth
of Liquid Desires, his father expressed disapproval towards Dali’s wife,
which explains the rejection underlying this piece. This is a surrealist work
because of the repressed sexual desire and because there are so many different
emotions conveyed, the painting doesn’t make any sense.
It's interesting how the Surrealists change artistic conventions by trying to give up conscious control over their works of art (like with automatism). This idea of can even be compared to how the Dada artists embrace the element of chance (or the rejection of subjectivity in art, like you mentioned). In both instances, the artist is trying to give up control over how the work of art will appear.
ReplyDelete-Prof. Bowen
I once used a glass urinal in a floral design for the county fair. It was shaped much like the plastic ones used now for males who cannot get out of bed but much more curvy and graceful (and probably cold!). I didn't win any prize but they didn't disqualify me either. Someone besides me has a weird sense of humor I suppose. (I later sold the container for $25 at a yard sale. The thing was almost 100 years old and since glass breaks...they are getting rare.)
ReplyDeleteSurrealism always seemed to me to be a well-crafted (smooth brushwork)exercise in improbability. Most separate elements in Dali's works are completely recognizable- it's just the way a dream works to put these elements together and create a surreal effect.
It is weird for me to think that someone like Duchamp could take a ready-made object and present it as art, because if you think about it someone else had already created it. But I do agree with you that he is trying to make a statement that serves a different purpose and puts a different perspective to the mundane objects. I also think he wants people to view the objects more closely and pay more attention to the detail.
ReplyDeleteI understand what you're saying about artists needing both technical skill and creativity, but I think I disagree. Art, like you mentioned, is something different for everyone, and I think that anyone from philosophers with new thoughts to a person who works to manufacture products could be considered artists. I think that art can be the everyday, or something extremely dynamic and socially/culturally challenging. Duchamp did an excellent job illustrating this, and forcing people to really question the art world and what is considered art.
ReplyDelete